top of page

Eliminating Excess Costs in Retirement Plans

  • Writer: Mark Nicholas
    Mark Nicholas
  • Apr 5, 2023
  • 2 min read

Updated: Feb 4, 2025

Small and mid-sized businesses often have expensive retirement programs, but many of them don't realize what the true cost is. This is, in large part, due to fees being charged against assets, leaving employers with little, if any, of the service costs. These are instead charged against participant accounts. While it may seem nice to not have plan fees as a line item in the budget, this structure is rarely advantageous to anyone except the service providers. There are 3 hidden costs at play here that rarely get mentioned:

  1. Guaranteed fee hikes. When service providers charge asset based fees on savings plans where contributions flow into the plan regularly, plan fees will increase at the same rate that balances do. If new contributions boosted plan assets by 2% and the investments returned 6%, assuming no withdrawals, provider fees would increase by about 8% along with the assets. Talk about inflation! Chances are, if the company was paying the fee directly, the significance of the change would result in a negotiated charge, but this rarely happens when it doesn't hit the budget for review. Out of sight, out of mind.

  2. Compounding of fees. We often hear of the benefits compounding has on investments, but when fees are taken from participant accounts, there's a compounding effect from fees too. Over a 35 year period, a 1% asset based fee would be expected to reduce your balance by 28%!

  3. Loss of tax deductions/credits. Companies are generally eligible to deduct administrative costs to reduce taxes or take advantage of tax credits to offset the cost of starting a plan or implementing auto enrollment.

Let's look at how this might play out in real life. We'll use a plan with $2 million in assets and $60,000 in annual contributions with investment returns anticipated at 6% annually. The business owner has 30% of the plan assets in her own account and the company is taxed at a 25% rate. The total asset based fees come in at 1.3% of assets


If Paid by Company

If Paid with Plan Assets

Total Fee

$26,000

$26,000

Tax Deduction

$6,500

$0.00

Net Cost

$19,500

$26,000

Reduction in Future Earnings (20 Years)

$0.00

$83,385

Total Cost

$19,500

$109,385

Owner's Share of Cost

$19,500

$32,815

Excess Cost

$89,885


As you can see, the long term impact of asset based fees on plan participant accounts can be staggering with one year's fees costing the plan participants over 4 times the amount billed in fees over the next 20 years. Remember, this is only illustrating the effect for a single year. When you look at the excess costs associated with asset based fees over decades, it is outright mind boggling! The fee for the next year's services in this example would be projected to rise by over $2,300 also, making it (and each subsequent year) even more expensive.


Want an analysis of your plan costs? Click the button below to schedule a free chat!





 
 
 

Comments


Recent Blogs

Your 401(k) Shouldn't Feel Like A Prison Cell

If your 401(k) feels more like a holding tank than a wealth-building tool, it's not just your imagination running wild. Many American workers have their retirement savings trapped in places that limit access, layer on fees, and quietly erode returns.

When the Referee Buys a Team: The Hidden Risks of America’s New State-Investor Trend

When the government owns part of a company, it faces an unavoidable conflict of interest...The danger isn’t that America suddenly turns socialist—it’s that free enterprise slowly becomes state-dependent. Capitalism works because the game is fair, the rules are known, and the referee doesn’t care who wins. Once the referee owns the team, that trust disappears. And without trust, no market—no matter how wealthy or advanced—can stand.

Private Equity In Your 401(k)?

The combination of high costs, valuation risk, and a general lack of transparency have kept private investments on the sideline to date - they just haven't been able to clear the prudent investment bar. Loosening regulations likely won't change that without some significant changes in the private equity product space, which won't change overnight. With retirement plan litigation on the rise, why would a fiduciary take the risk on this when they don't have to?

bottom of page